Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Synchronicity for the Day: Numbers No. 3

Wow, here is a nice one. I just finished reading The Seth Material, by Jane Roberts, one of many books by this author, and the second of which I have completed. I have a stack of more of them at the ready. Their material constitutes fodder for an entire world of posts, so I will not get into it right now. It's late and my contacts are getting blurry. And I'm typing on a laptop, which I hate.

As I am laying down the book, which has nicely been rearranging (or maybe supplementing is a better word) the way I view the universe lately, my attention is drawn to the bookmark I have been using. My typical bookmark consists of either remembering what page number I was on, which often works, or whatever scrap of paper happens to be lying around at the time I get started on the book.

I must have started this book just after a Tarot session, because I have been using as a bookmark, a folded up piece of neon pink paper that had been living in the wooden box where I keep my cards. This piece of paper has been in the box for well over a year. On it was written the birth information of an acquaintance, who had written it down for me so that I could take a look at her natal chart and give her some information. The box was where I tucked the paper away and that's where it stayed, for no good reason, until it recently became a bookmark.

So as my attention is now drawn to this pink piece of folded paper, I suddenly think, hmmm.... and have the urge to unfold it and look at the birth date. I open it up and the woman's birthday written inside is July 23rd (I'll keep the year to myself), 11:30 PM.  When did I put down the book as I finished it? July 23rd, at 11:30 PM. Freaking AWESOME.



I would like to believe that this synchronicity means that I am on the correct path in reading these books, and this assumption has been backed up by my friends on the board as well. When I first stumbled upon these books while looking into another topic, I was intrigued and asked someone we were talking to on the board if the material was worth a read, and if so, how much of it was true? They replied (astonishingly, because they are almost never so absolute in what they say) that it was 100% true and that reading it would save them a lot of time explaining any number of complicated ideas. So far I have not only found this to be the case, but I have also enjoyed a series of validations where a number of very specific concepts were explained in an almost identical manner in the book as to the explanations we had received while using the board when asking about the same ideas months, and even years before I had any knowledge of the books at all.

I don't know how to finish out this post, except to say that that was a beautiful synchronicity, and I appreciated being able to see it.

Love and Peace

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Synchronicity Discussion at Universal Mind Science

OK, I have not posted in a seriously long time. I guess I could blame it on the Mercury Retrograde, since he is an easy scapegoat, but this dry spell has been going on for longer than that. I keep telling myself that my next post has to be something on a larger topic, and I think I was putting too much pressure on myself to come up with something awesome, and therefore psyched myself out of writing at all.

So in a sort-of cheater way, this post is actually a summary I wrote of a discussion that occurred over two weeks at the metaphysical church I attend. To be fair, I was the facilitator of said discussion, so much of the material covered came from me. There are also stories related by other participants in the discussion, and excerpts from various research materials.

I am lucky enough to have found a church that does not have a single person who delivers a sermon while there is a mute listening audience who is asked to accept what they are being told without question. Rather, each week we have a discussion that is lead by a facilitator (who is not always the same person every time) and that person brings in some thought-provoking material to help get a conversation started. Anyone can put in their two cents on any topic, as our philosophy is that we are all there to learn from each other. I can't speak highly enough of this group, and this may be for selfish reasons, as they accepted me for who I was right from the first time I visited to see what they were all about. There's no dogma, there's no, "This is the one and only way to be and if you are not this way then you are on a path to damnation." There is only, "Here is my experience. What do you think?" Beautiful. You are made to feel like it is a conversation among equals, not as though there is only one enlightened leader who is going to teach an ignorant flock the ways of the universe. But I digress.

So for two Sundays in July, I mustered my courage and volunteered to lead a discussion on Synchronicity, as this is a topic that I thought would be able to spur a conversation, and that I had some experience with. I was nervous, which is odd for someone who normally has zero problems with public speaking, but everyone reassured me that I needn't worry, and kept reminding me that I didn't have to know everything about everything to facilitate a discussion.

So below are my notes for the two weeks of conversation.  You can also read them at the church's Facebook page. I volunteered one Sunday to create a summary of our weekly discussions for Facebook, and have been doing it ever since, so you are welcome to see more of what I get up to in my free time when I'm not blogging about talking boards.

Synchronicity: Service Notes for 7/1/12 - 7/8/12

For two weeks we discussed the subject of Synchronicity.

What is Synchronicity? It is defined as: "The experience of two or more events that are apparently causally unrelated or unlikely to occur together by chance, yet are experienced as occurring together in a meaningful manner. The concept of synchronicity was first described in this terminology by Carl Gustav Jung, a Swiss psychologist, in the 1920s"



What do we think synchronicity means to us? A very basic idea of what the concept meant to Carl Jung, who coined the term is as follows: "Following discussions with both Albert Einstein and Wolfgang Pauli, Jung believed that there were parallels between synchronicity and aspects of relativity theory and quantum mechanics. Jung was transfixed by the idea that life was not a series of random events but rather an expression of a deeper order, which he and Pauli referred to as Unus mundus. This deeper order led to the insights that a person was both embedded in an orderly framework and was the focus of that orderly framework and that the realisation of this was more than just an intellectual exercise, but also having elements of a spiritual awakening. From the religious perspective, synchronicity shares similar characteristics of an "intervention of grace". Jung also believed that in a person's life, synchronicity served a role similar to that of dreams, with the purpose of shifting a person's egocentric conscious thinking to greater wholeness."

Our group had many personal examples to share with us of synchronous events that had occurred in their lives:


Lara recalled the time in her life when she was considering a move to Chicago - everywhere she looked, there were references to the city, as if the universe were reassuring her that this was the right move to make. One day she was attending a Highland Scottish Festival with a friend of hers and she was explaining to her friend this Chicago phenomenon. Her friend brushed it off as coincidence, but just a few moments later, as her and her friend went to view a bagpipe performance, the first pipe band up to play was from Chicago, as if to prove to her that she was not imagining things and reading into normal coincidences.

Neils discussed his lake house back east, where he said that at an earlier visit, he had discovered that a very large tree had fallen into the lake. He tasked a local man to haul the tree out of the lake and dispose of it, but various circumstances prevented this undertaking from being completed. The next time he visited the house there had recently been extensive, and seasonally uncommon rains, causing the lake to flood, and the tree to float to the surface. Now they were easily able to haul it out of the lake with a rope and cut it up into firewood. What were the odds that they would happen to be at the house just in time for the flooding, when they had no idea who they would have gotten the offending tree out of the lake otherwise?

Richard remembered when his brother, who was born in 1937, passed away. Suddenly Richard began seeing 37s everywhere that he happened to look at numbers: Restaurant receipts, addresses, phone numbers. During a phone call with his sister, she said that she was experiencing the same thing, and they both decided that their brother was trying to send a message to them. At a psychic fair which took place after this had been going on, he received a message through a medium from his mother and the first thing she said was that his brother was OK, which was not a normal conversational gambit from her, to be so direct about such a subject.

An example cited by more than one UMS member concerned a time when the church building was undergoing a remodel. The city inspectors insisted that the building have at least two restrooms, so that there would be both a ladies' and a men's room. As church members scratched their heads, wondering how they would rectify this issue on their already limited budget, a man drove by and introduced himself as a plumber. He said that he had just come from a job and had two toilets he didn't end up using, and wanted to know if anyone would be interested in buying them at a very low price, as he needed to be rid of them. Perfect timing!

A fun example was read from the book: Synchronicity & You, by Frank Joseph : "Few motion pictures were more plagued with production nightmares than the 1939 version of The Wizard of Oz.  Among the lesser, although vexing, problems confronting Victor Fleming (one of five directors associated with the film) was something as simple as locating the right kind of coat for the traveling fortune-teller to wear. Incredibly, the studio did not possess a single frock coat that fit Frank Morgan, who portrayed Professor Marvel, or satisfied Fleming. He gave an ultimatum to the head of the props department, saying, "Bring me the coat I want after lunch, or you're fired!" Production had already gone far over budget, so falling behind now on its shooting schedule would result in the film's cancellation. In a panic, the props chief ran from the lot and sprinted several miles to the nearest pawn shop. There, in the back room, he found an old black coat he hoped would pacify the director. It looked about the right size, too. He returned in time for the shoot to find that the long-tailed coat fit actor Morgan perfectly and met Fleming's specifications. Months later, after filming and editing were completed and all the props were collected and returned to storage, the coat used for Professor Marvel's part hit a bureaucratic snag. The item was not in the Warner Brothers stock catalogue, and the prop chief had to explain how and where he obtained it. Turning the collar up to sew in a company label, he was surprised to find a tag bearing the name of its former owner. It read simply, "L. Frank Baum," author of the original Wizard of Oz series of children's books. Baum had already been dead for twenty years, so he could not appreciate this meaningful coincidence, made all the more intriguing because he personally identified with the character who wore the coat, Professor Marvel. The connection was appropriate, nevertheless, in that the 1939 film version did more to popularize his life's work that any publishing effort could have."

We had many questions about this phenomenon:

What counts as a synchronicity? Premonitions? Dreams? Repetition within a short span of time of the same numbers, words or phrases, objects?

Are all these incidents and occurrences happening because we are looking for them, or are they there all the time and it is up to us to use them and open ourselves to them? Or perhaps, are we simply catching an unfettered glimpse of the unifying underlying structure of the universe when our ego consciousness momentarily quiets down? We all had different opinions of which idea was closest to truth, and some of us allowed that it could be any or all of these things, depending on the situation.

During the first week of the discussion the question was asked, "What is the difference between a coincidence, a synchronicity, and a miracle?" When Rochelle, the facilitator of this discussion, was contemplating this question, she received an answer "out of the blue," that was posed as another question to her, "What is the difference between a wave and a tsunami?" The answer was: Magnitude.

The more we take note of synchronicities, the more of them we will see. The universe will show itself to us if we are willing to see it. We talked about how we have to let go of trying to control every aspect of our lives and  let the synchronicities of the world help us.

Synchronicity is a way that we can experience oneness with the universe.

One participant provided an apt metaphor: We are now used to using GPS systems in our cars or on our phones. If we have set out GPS to provide us with directions to a destination, and we you go the wrong way, the GPS will re-direct us until we get where we are supposed to go. The farther off track from the destination we get, the longer and more difficult it will be to get back to the correct path. Synchronicities may be like warnings or guidance trying to nudge us onto the right path. The whole system is self-correcting. If you miss the clues, they will come around again.



We suggested the possibility of keeping a synchronicity journal, so that we may see larger patterns that we are unable to notice when we only look at each small instance separately, especially those instances where we cannot immediately see a meaning behind the event. Not only could we discover larger patterns among our synchronicities, but we would be able to take note of recurring types of incidents that may be specific to us, personally.


How can we interpret the meanings behind these events? Frank Joseph, in the book mentioned above in the Wizard of Oz story, says, "To scrutinize something like synchronicity is to diminish it. We murder when we dissect. In trying to understand the phenomenon, the degree to which we analyze it determines how it either divulges itself or escapes up. Indeed, it is less important that we consciously understand a meaningful coincidence than that we allow ourselves to feel it. What we may never understand intellectually we more certainly grasp subconsciously, with other ways of knowing. People long in contact with synchronous events believe humans have more ways of knowing than most of us realize. they regard the rational mind as a jealous tyrant at all times, who, afraid of losing control, needs to dominate all things at all times and refuses to recognize our intuitive capacity for knowledge through feeling. A concertgoer who confines his attention to the scientific principles of air set in motion through certain vibrations generated by wooden and metal instruments will hear various frequencies of sound, but no music."

As Rev. Jess said at the end of this discussion, "The answers are all there in the æther, until you ask the questions, the knowledge means nothing to you."