Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Synchronicity for the Day: Numbers No. 3

Wow, here is a nice one. I just finished reading The Seth Material, by Jane Roberts, one of many books by this author, and the second of which I have completed. I have a stack of more of them at the ready. Their material constitutes fodder for an entire world of posts, so I will not get into it right now. It's late and my contacts are getting blurry. And I'm typing on a laptop, which I hate.

As I am laying down the book, which has nicely been rearranging (or maybe supplementing is a better word) the way I view the universe lately, my attention is drawn to the bookmark I have been using. My typical bookmark consists of either remembering what page number I was on, which often works, or whatever scrap of paper happens to be lying around at the time I get started on the book.

I must have started this book just after a Tarot session, because I have been using as a bookmark, a folded up piece of neon pink paper that had been living in the wooden box where I keep my cards. This piece of paper has been in the box for well over a year. On it was written the birth information of an acquaintance, who had written it down for me so that I could take a look at her natal chart and give her some information. The box was where I tucked the paper away and that's where it stayed, for no good reason, until it recently became a bookmark.

So as my attention is now drawn to this pink piece of folded paper, I suddenly think, hmmm.... and have the urge to unfold it and look at the birth date. I open it up and the woman's birthday written inside is July 23rd (I'll keep the year to myself), 11:30 PM.  When did I put down the book as I finished it? July 23rd, at 11:30 PM. Freaking AWESOME.



I would like to believe that this synchronicity means that I am on the correct path in reading these books, and this assumption has been backed up by my friends on the board as well. When I first stumbled upon these books while looking into another topic, I was intrigued and asked someone we were talking to on the board if the material was worth a read, and if so, how much of it was true? They replied (astonishingly, because they are almost never so absolute in what they say) that it was 100% true and that reading it would save them a lot of time explaining any number of complicated ideas. So far I have not only found this to be the case, but I have also enjoyed a series of validations where a number of very specific concepts were explained in an almost identical manner in the book as to the explanations we had received while using the board when asking about the same ideas months, and even years before I had any knowledge of the books at all.

I don't know how to finish out this post, except to say that that was a beautiful synchronicity, and I appreciated being able to see it.

Love and Peace

No comments:

Post a Comment